|
|
|
|
JoeNelsens Web Site
|
Date: 4-8-2014
|
Number of Hours: 2.00
|
Manual Reference:
|
Brief Description: more
|
|
1) now this couple of pictures shows what I was probably overly concerned about, namely the ends did not install fluch like the plans said they should. with everything set up by the specs given, and dont bother to ask how many times I went over and over and over the setups, I still had this level of difference. that is, RH side was proud of the mound by3/4" whilst the LH side was a measley 3/8".
What the hey, or is it what the hay? Hay of course is the first stage of horse you-know-what. and that is what I was thinking.
2) The LH side in coparison.
Now, at this time I input soem inquiries on the sonexbuilders net, and Mike Parley began a nice little chat with me. the outcome was that I had done nothing grossly wrong, and I was setteling for making the differences shown here the same, side to side, for looks. They are pround of the mount be 3/8". Now, 3/8" in prop height I feel wont make much of a difference to the actual flight conditions, but, being the engineer that I am/was, there has to be an explaination for the behavior( being proud of the mount in this case). the resulting consequences could be accepted or rejected in light of other things. I accepted the 3/8 " proudness, set the vertical drop of the axels per the plans the same on both sides, and ended up with the LH axel vbeing not 100% seated, where the RH was. The LH side was about 1/2 " up from fully seated, but it was level with the RH, and all other parameters were good. I left it alone for a day or two and went back and did the set up again, and that same resulet were evidenced. So, I drilled and bolted. Done and done.
|
|
oops
|
|
whaaa??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2001-2024 Matronics. All Rights Reserved.
|
